Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 185 MASS 264 - Moore v. Rawson

Moore v. Rawson’s Empirical Analysis

1904

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
September 2008
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 40 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2008 · most notably Slay v. Burnett Trust (1945), Lowell Bar Ass'n v. Loeb (1943)

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 40 state decisions

11019041910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bank v. Carrollton Railroad · Hoxie v. Chaney · McMurtrie v. Guiler · Robinson v. Simmons · Turnbull v. Pomeroy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““While no rule can be laid down by which the good will of a trading partnership in all cases can be ascertained and its value fixed with mathematical precision and accuracy, yet, if it be assumed that a firm has been in existence for a time long enough to establish a business sufficiently permanent in character to include not only its customers, but the incidents of locality, and a distinctive name, these advantages constitute a going business enterprise; and it may then be said that the name and what is done under it go together, and a good will exists which forms an asset of commercial value in a winding up between partners. The fact that such an asset may be difficult of appraisement is no legal reason for denying to the retiring partner an appraisal, if it be proved that he is entitled to it.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.