Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 185 Md. 136 - Thomas v. Klemm

Thomas v. Klemm’s Empirical Analysis

1945

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
states following
August 2009
most recently cited

4 district · 22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently August 2009 · most notably Hill v. Cross Country Settlement, LLC (2007), Space Aero Products Co. v. R. E. Darling Co. (1965)

4 district · 22 state decisions

901945195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Precision Instrument Mfg Co v. Automotive Maintenance Machinery Co · Peugh v. Davis · Conway's Executors and Devisees v. Alexander · Booth v. Robinson · Langley v. Devlin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he maxim that “he who comes into equity must come with clean hands” closes the doors of a court of equity to any person who has violated any of the fundamental principles of equity relative to the matter in which he seeks relief, however improper may have been the behavior of the defendant. The doctrine is rooted in the historical concept of equity as a vehicle for affirmatively enforcing the requirements of conscience and good faith. While equity does not demand that its suitors shall have led blameless lives as to other matters, it does require that they shall have acted fairly and without fraud or deceit as to the controversy in issue.... Any willful act concerning the cause of action which rightfully can be said to transgress equitable standards of conduct is sufficient cause for the application of the maxim by the chancellor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he doctrine is firmly established that a conveyance, although purporting to be an absolute sale, and without any accompanying written defeasance, contract of repurchase, or other agreement, may be treated in equity as a mortgage as between the original parties and against all persons deriving title from the grantee who are not bona fide purchasers for value and without notice, if it is shown to have been intended merely as security for an existing debt or a contemporaneous loan. Id. at 139 , 43 A.2d 193 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.