185 Md. App. 559 - Burlas v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
20 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · State v. Albrecht · State v. Stanley · State v. Suddith · 5 Md. App. 340 - Nichols v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An assessment of the legal sufficiency of the evidence is not an evidentiary issue but a substantive issue, with respect to which an appellate court makes its own independent judgment, as a matter of law. This is an area wherein the reviewing court is not at all deferential to the trial court. It makes the same determination on the same basis as does the trial court. In assessing legal sufficiency, we will look only at that which was formally received in evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“cease to be responsible for his otherwise criminal conduct because there were other conditions which contributed to the same result.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Thomas
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.