Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 185 MOAPP 586 - Bentley v. Bentley

Bentley v. Bentley’s Empirical Analysis

1915

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
December 1923
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Selma Co v. United States · Gardner v. Springfield Gas & Electric Co. · A. Lehman & Co. v. Knapp

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““* * * Under all the circumstances and in view of the well-known methods of modern business and bank book keeping, and the absence of anything suspicious about the books, and the fact that they were duly identified as the books of the bank, we fail to see why the books themselves showing the accounts of the parties litigant were not admissible in evidence.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.