Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

185 N.C. 606

State v. Dalton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 21, 1923

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1923-02-21

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“The decisions of this Court have been uniform that on failure to docket the appeal in the time prescribed it will be docketed and dismissed unless a motion is made for certiorari at the next succeeding term and sufficient cause shown for the failure.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including State v. . Farmer

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1923-02-21

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently January 2002

6 state decisions

20192319301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Pee. Cueiam.

¶1It appearing from an inspection of tbe record that tbe defendant Jerry Dalton was tried and convicted of murder in tbe first degree at tbe April Term, 1920, of tbe Superior Court of Macon, and from tbe judgment on such conviction appealed to this Court, but did not docket bis appeal until 22 January, 1923, after six terms of this Court after such appeal was taken, on motion of tbe Attorney-General tbe appeal is docketed and dismissed.

¶2The decisions of this Court have been uniform that on failure to docket the appeal in the time prescribed, it will be docketed and dismissed unless a motion is made for certiorari at the next succeeding term and sufficient cause shown for failure to do so.

¶3This whole matter was discussed fully at last term with full citation of authorities in Rose v. Rocky Mount, 184 N. C., 609.

¶4If the a}3pellant bad docketed bis case in time and then escaped pending the appeal, the Court might either affirm judgment or dismiss the appeal or continue the case, in its discretion, and it would make no difference that the appellant was convicted of a capital felony. S. v. Jacobs, 107 N. C., 772, and S. v. Devane, 166 N. C., 281, in which the uniform decisions are cited and approved.

¶5In this case tbe defendant not only shows no excuse for failure to docket, but admits that be bad fled tbe jurisdiction of tbe State and remained absent until arrested and brought back. This certainly puts him in no better situation and entitles him to no special favor from tbe Court whose jurisdiction be evaded.

¶6Appeal dismissed.

/185/nc/606 · .json · Public domain