185 N.C. App. 337 - In Re THT’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
64
cited by 64 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
64 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 141 N.C. App. 475 - In Re Gleisner · Adams v. Tessener · 159 N.C. App. 75 - In Re Clark · 36 N.C. App. 601 - Steele v. Steele · 89 N.C. App. 171 - Matter of Bullabough
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If such evidence exists, the findings of the trial court are binding on appeal, even if the evidence would support a finding to the contrary.”
18 later decisions quote this exact passage“[a] juvenile who does not receive proper care, supervision, or discipline from the juvenile's parent, guardian, custodian, or caretaker; or who has been abandoned; or who is not provided necessary medical care; or who is not provided necessary remedial care; or who lives in an environment injurious to the juvenile's welfare; or who has been placed for care or adoption in violation of law. In determining whether a juvenile is a neglected juvenile, it is relevant whether that juvenile ... lives in a home where another juvenile has been subjected to abuse or neglect by an adult who regularly lives in the home.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“[c]reates or allows to be created a substantial risk of serious physical injury to the juvenile by other than accidental means; ... [u]ses or allows to be used upon the juvenile cruel or grossly inappropriate procedures or cruel or grossly inappropriate devices to modify behavior; ... [or c]reates or allows to be created serious emotional damage to the juvenile.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.