State v. Johns’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
5
states following
June 1985
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Escobedo v. Illinois · Massiah v. United States · Spano v. People of the State of New York · 70 Cal. 2d 522 - People v. Ireland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘Once the police know or have been apprised of the fact that the defendant is represented by counsel, or that an attorney has communicated with the police for the purpose of representing defendant, the accused’s right to counsel attaches, and this right is not dependent upon the existence of a formal retainer.’ The court also said: ‘There is no requirement that the attorney or the defendant request the police to respect this right of the defendant.’ ” [Emphasis supplied.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“If the individual states that he wants an attorney, the interrogation must cease until an attorney is present. At that time, the individual must have an opportunity to confer with the attorney and to have him present during any subsequent questioning.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Moore“`I would like to have my attorney present.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Moore
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.