Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 185 N.W.2d 790 - Johnson v. Pattison

Johnson v. Pattison’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
3
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably Horace Case v. Arthur E. Morrisette (1973), Curtis 1000, Inc. v. Youngblade (1995)

8 federal appellate · 22 state decisions

14019711980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stewart v. Finkelstone · Moyerman v. Glanzberg · Decker v. Hendricks · Armstrong v. Leverone · Peters v. Davis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Equity usually invokes its extraordinary injunctive power only when necessary to prevent irreparable harm or when the complaining party is otherwise without an effective remedy. If the injury is slight and an injunction would result in serious hardship or loss to the defendant, courts have refused to enjoin, leaving the plaintiff to his claim for damages. Under this comparative injury doctrine, injunctions which are likely to cause greater injustice than they seek to prevent are properly refused.””
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) a clear and definite oral agreement; (2) proof that plaintiff acted to his detriment in reliance thereon; and (3) a finding that the equities entitle plaintiff to [the] relief.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.