Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

185 So. 2d 193

Morrison v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1966-04-19

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1966

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1966-04-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Appellant was tried and convicted of breaking and entering a store building with intent to commit grand larceny. Subsequently, he filed a motion for relief pursuant to Rule No. I, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix. The sole allegation of this motion was that he was inadequately represented by the Public Defender who refused to file a motion for new trial and an appeal.

¶2Inasmuch as the record conclusively refutes the allegation, the trial judge correctly denied the motion without a hearing thereon.

¶3Affirmed.

/185/so2d/193 · .json · Public domain