Chase v. Dunbar’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently May 2007
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hudgens v. Mayeaux · 95 So. 2d 705 - King v. Mason · Bolton v. North River Insurance Company · 27 So. 2d 137 - Oglesby v. Town of Winnfield · 142 So. 2d 537 - Wall v. Windmann
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“: The actions of the mechanics herein were in essence a test to determine whether the engine could be made to run or whether adjustments or repairs were necessary to make it functional. We hold, therefore, that the attempt to start the vehicle under the circumstances shown constitutes”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“"(g) to an owned automobile while used by any person while such person is employed or otherwise engaged in the automobile business."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“wherein [the court] held the starting of a truck's motor at the request of a mechanic repairing the engine constituted 'maintenance'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McNeil v. Hansen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.