Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 185 SO2D 649 - Cannada v. Marlar

Cannada v. Marlar’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 2012
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 2012

5 state decisions

20196619701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cheatham v. Smith · Butler v. Smith · Stokes v. Newell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The judgment of the lower court is against the overwhelming weight of the law and the evidence. The lower court erred in holding that the appellee was not guilty 'of laches and in not dismissing this suit because of appellee’s laches in bringing same. The lower court erred in not holding that there was a substantial compliance by appellants with Section 5851, Mississippi Code of 1942. The court erred in not reducing the amount of judgment incommensurate with the earnings of appellee from the time of his dismissal to the trial of this cause.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.