Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 185 So. 3d 269 - Williams v. Bestcomp, Inc.

185 So. 3d 269 - Williams v. Bestcomp, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Villaume v. Villaume · LaBove v. Theriot · 603 So. 2d 761 - Webster v. Boh Bros. Const. Co., Inc. · Benoit v. INTRACOSTAL TUBULAR SERVICES, INC. · 58 So. 3d 1057 - Eubanks v. Kepco Operating, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While a final judgment is appealable 'in all causes in which appeals are given by law,' an interlocutory judgment is appealable only when expressly provided for by law. La.Code Civ.P. art. 2083.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.