¶1AFFIRMED. See Golden v. State, 84 So.3d 396, 398 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (“Assuming arguendo that the trial court properly allowed Golden’s counsel- to adopt'the pro se motion, the effective- date of an adopted pro se motion is the date it is adopted- and not the initial date the unauthorized pleading was filed.”).
185 So. 3d 695
Isla v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 12, 2016
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2016-02-12
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 2017
1 state decisions
Relies on Golden v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2016-02-12
View the full empirical analysis of this case →