Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

185 So. 3d 745

In re Pardue

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 4, 2016

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 2016-03-04

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 2019

5 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2016-03-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING '

PER CURIAM.

¶2JjThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent was arrested on charges of-operating a vessel while intoxicated, aggravated flight from an officer, resisting an officer, and having no stern lights on the vessel he was operating. Respondent subsequently pleaded no contest to careless operation and flight from an officer. Following the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

¶3IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Ashton DeVan Pardue, Louisiana Bar Roll number 25815, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months.

¶4IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

/185/so3d/745 · .json · Public domain