Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

185 S.W. 998

Ex parte Vansickle

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 12, 1916

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1916-04-12

<p>Appeal from District Court, Potter County; Hugh D. Umphres, Judge.</p> <p>Lee Vansiekle, under á writ of habeas corpus, was refused bail, and he appeals.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1922

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Decided 1916-04-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

DAVIDSON, J.

¶1Appellant, under a writ of habeas corpus proceeding, was Without discussing the facts, and following the practice of this court in opinion writing on this character of case, the reasons are not given why we have reached the conclusion that the judgment should be affirmed.

¶2The judgment, therefore, is ordered to be affirmed.

/185/sw/998 · .json · Public domain