Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

185 S.W.3d 286

Rambo v. Kimbrough

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 7, 2006

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2006-03-07

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 2012

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-03-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Julius Rambo appeals a final judgment of the Circuit Court of Jackson County granting Auto Club Family Insurance Company’s (“ACFIC’s”) motion to dismiss Count II of his second amended petition for failure to state a claim against ACFIC upon which relief could be granted to Rambo. Rambo contends that his second amended petition stated a valid third-party beneficiary claim against ACFIC upon which relief could be granted to him and that the trial court erred in ruling otherwise. No error of law appears and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

¶3We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

/185/sw3d/286 · .json · Public domain