Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 185 SW3D 451 - Ex Parte Burr

Ex Parte Burr’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2010
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas))

Relationships

Relies on Kutzner v. State · State Ex Rel. Vance v. Routt · Jeter v. State · Ex Parte Paprskar · Weiner v. Dial

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[There is] no doubt that a bond forfeiture proceeding is criminal in nature.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.