Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 185 U.S. 505 - McFaddin v. Evans-Snider-Buel Co.

McFaddin v. Evans-Snider-Buel Co.’s Empirical Analysis

185 U.S. 505 · 1902

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
10
cited 10 times by the Supreme Court
8
states following
February 1984
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions (10 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1984 · most notably United States v. Security Industrial Bank (1982), United States v. Felipe Sandoval (1913)

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 18 state decisions

130190219101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Anderson · State of Louisiana Folsom v. Mayor Etc of the City of New Orleans · Randall v. Kreiger · Freeborn v. Smith · Freeland v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Provided, that if the mortgagor is a nonresident of the Indian Territory, the mortgage shall be recorded in the judicial district in which the property is situated at .the time the mortgage is executed. All mortgages of personal property in the Indian Territory heretofore executed and recorded in the judicial district thereof in which the property was situated at the time they were executed are hereby validated.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “such acts are of a remedial character, and are the peculiar subjects of legislation. They are not liable to the imputation of being assumptions of judicial power.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.