Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 185 VT 267 - DeYoung v. Ruggerio

DeYoung v. Ruggerio’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

2 district · 14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Preston v. Murty · Brewer v. Second Baptist Church · Brueckner v. Norwich University · Pulla v. Amoco Oil Co. · Tuttle v. Raymond

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a party has been fully heard on an issue and there is no legally sufficient evidentiary basis for a reasonable jury to find for that party ... the court may determine the issue against that party and may grant a motion for judgment as a matter of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “malice may arise from deliberate and outrageous conduct aimed at securing financial gain or some other advantage at another's expense, even if the motivation underlying the outrageous conduct is to benefit oneself rather than harm another.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “whether the [trial] court applied the legal framework required under Rule 702 and Daubert "). Further, if there is an "arguable lack of clarity in our case law”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.