Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 185 WASHAPP 891 - State v. P.E.T.

State v. P.E.T.’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Arizona v. Fulminante · Pate v. Robinson · Medina v. California · 123 Wash. 2d 641 - State v. Hill · 120 Wash. 2d 631 - State v. Benn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We uphold findings of fact if they are supported by substantial evidence. 'Substantial evidence' is evidence sufficient to persuade a fair-minded, rational person of the truth of the finding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.