Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 185 Wis. 2d 254 - State v. Messelt

185 Wis. 2d 254 - State v. Messelt’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
4
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

45 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably 176 Ill. 2d 326 - People v. Olinger (1997), 190 Wis. 2d 31 - State v. Flynn (1994)

45 state decisions

300199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wainwright v. Witt · Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood · Turner v. Louisiana · Tanner v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “any outside influence was improperly brought to bear upon any juror.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 215 Wis. 2d 16 - State v. Delgado · 190 Wis. 2d 677 - State v. Williquette
  2. “'Extraneous information' is information which a juror obtains from a non-eviden-tiary source, other than the 'general wisdom' we expect jurors to possess.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 188 Wis. 2d 298 - State v. Eison · 196 Wis. 2d 218 - State v. Heitkemper
  3. “that the extraneous information was potentially prejudicial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 190 Wis. 2d 31 - State v. Flynn · 188 Wis. 2d 298 - State v. Eison

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.