Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 185 WVA 225 - Hively v. Martin

Hively v. Martin’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
July 2002
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 155 W. Va. 875 - McDaniel v. Romano · 163 W. Va. 464 - Parsons v. Consolidated Gas Supply Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`[The following factors should be considered by a court where there has been an appearance and late answer filed by the defaulting party]: (1) The degree of prejudice suffered by the plaintiff from the delay in answering; (2) the presence of material issues of fact and meritorious defenses; (3) the significance of the interests at stake; and (4) the degree of intransigence on the part of the defaulting party.' Syllabus Point 3, as modified, Parsons v. Consol. Gas Supply Corp., 163 W.Va. 464 , 256 S.E.2d 758 (1979).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.