Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 185 W. Va. 462 - C.W. Development, Inc. v. Structures, Inc.

185 W. Va. 462 - C.W. Development, Inc. v. Structures, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co. · Duggin v. Adams · 169 W. Va. 673 - Harless v. First National Bank in Fairmont · 177 W. Va. 323 - Hayseeds, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Cas. · Top Service Body Shop, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Punitive or exemplary damages are such as, in a proper case, a jury may allow against the defendant by way of punishment for wilfulness, wantonness, malice, or other like aggravation of his wrong to the plaintiff, over and above full compensation for all injuries directly or indirectly resulting from such wrong." Syllabus Point 1, O'Brien v. Snodgrass, 123 W.Va. 483 , 16 S.E.2d 621 (1941).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Defendants are not liable for interference that is negligent rather than intentional, or if they show defenses of legitimate competition between plaintiff and them selves, their financial interest in the induced party's business, ... or other factors that show the interference was proper.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““(1) existence of a contractual or business relationship or expectancy; (2) an intentional act of interference by a party outside that relationship or expectancy; (3) proof that the interference caused the harm sustained; and (4) damages.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.