Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 185 W. Va. 512 - State v. DeBerry

185 W. Va. 512 - State v. DeBerry’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
May 2007
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Grayned v. City of Rockford · Grayned v. City of Rockford · People v. Hoehl · 158 W. Va. 111 - State v. Flinn · State v. Lucero

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]here is no satisfactory formula to decide if a statute is so vague as to violate the due process clauses of the State and Federal Constitutions. The basic requirements are that such a statute must be couched in such language so as to notify a potential offender of a criminal provision as to what he should avoid doing in order to ascertain if he has violated the offense provided and it may be couched in general language.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “The term “neglect,” as defined by W.Va. Code, 61-8D-1(6) (1988), is not unconstitutionally vague in violation of due process principles contained in U.S. Const, amend. XIV, § 1, and W.Va. Const. art. Ill, § 10. Therefore, W.Va.Code, 61-8D-4(b) (1988), is not unconstitutionally vague in violation of due process principles contained in U.S. Const, amend. XIV, § 1, and W.Va. Const. art. Ill, § 10, because such statute’s use of the term “neglect” gives a person of ordinary intelligence fair notice that his or her contemplated conduct is prohibited, and it also provides adequate standards for adjudication.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.