Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 186 A3D 490 - M. Mazur v. J. Cuthbert

M. Mazur v. J. Cuthbert’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. COM., PA. BD. OF PROB. & PAR. · Commonwealth v. McGrogan · Pollard v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. · Pollard v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. · Dernovesk v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]n employee cannot be considered to be furthering an employer's interest in such a situation, nor can such conduct be considered merely incidental to authorized conduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.