Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

186 A.D.2d 1090

People v. Moore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1992-10-07

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 2002

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1992-10-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting her upon her plea of guilty to criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree, defendant argued that the court erred in failing to hold an in camera hearing pursuant to People v Darden (34 NY2d 177, rearg denied 34 NY2d 995). We agreed and remitted the case for a Darden hearing (124 AD2d 1032). Based on that hearing transcript, we are satisfied that the warrant was issued upon probable cause. We further find that the informant’s reliability was established by the police officer’s affidavit, in which he asserted that the informant had given information that had led to two arrests and convictions (see, People v Rodriguez, 52 NY2d 483, 489).

¶2We have examined defendant’s remaining arguments on appeal and find them to be without merit. (Resubmission of Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Marshall, J. — Criminal Possession Stolen Property, 2nd Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Balio, Lawton and Boehm, JJ.

/186/ad2d/1090 · .json · Public domain