Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 186 Ark. 134 - Buzbee v. Hutton

Buzbee v. Hutton’s Empirical Analysis

1932

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
March 2001
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently March 2001 · most notably Mears v. Hall (1978), Beaumont v. Adkisson (1980)

29 state decisions

8019321940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Webb v. Adams · Waterman v. Hawkins · Greene County v. Lydy · State ex rel. Moose v. Woodruff · Cannon v. May

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “" ‘Whether an act of the Legislature be a local or general law must be determined by the generality with which it affects the people as a whole, rather than the extent of the territory over which it operates; and if it affects equally all persons who come within its range, it can be neither special nor local within the meaning of the Constitution.’ ””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The majority of the court is also of the opinion that the act is not local or special because it is general in its terms, and is not based upon an unreasonable or arbitrary classification. The act affects every one alike coming within its general terms, and is not to be nullified merely because under present conditions only the county of the seat of the State government happens to fall within the general classification.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.