In Re Procter’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 2011
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 523 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc. · United States v. Turkette · Russello v. United States · Richards v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he term, 'rights of action,' is defined as 'the right to bring suit; a legal right to maintain an action, growing out of a given transaction or state of facts and based thereon'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Christians v. Dulas“[r]ights of action for injuries to the person of the debtor or of a relative whether or not resulting in death.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Christians v. Dulas
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.