In Re Davison’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently November 2018
1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 349 · 11 U.S.C. § 524 · 11 U.S.C. § 525
Relies on Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. · Smith v. Commercial Banking Corp. · Armel Laminates Inc. v. Lomas & Nettleton Co. · Morris Fidelity Deposit Company of Maryland v. W Morris · In the Matter of Statistical Tabulating Corp Inc Appeal of United States of America
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[c]losing a case after full administration of a plan ... creates rights ... that may very well have to be adjudicated ... at a later time. But the results of a dismissal have different consequences ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Creamer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.