Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 186 CONN 414 - State v. D'ANTUONO

State v. D'ANTUONO’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

78
cited by 78 later decisions
1
states following
October 2020
most recently cited

78 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 78 later decisions — most recently October 2020 · most notably State v. Sivri (1994), State v. Blades (1993)

78 state decisions

43019821990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Patterson v. New York · Swansboro Country, Inc. v. Lumberman's Mortgage Co. · Hullum v. United States · Angrist v. United States · Union Labor Life Insurance v. Pireno

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “was exposed to an extremely unusual and overwhelming stress”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]his court will construe the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the trial court's [finding of guilt] and will affirm the conclusion of the trier of fact [regarding the affirmative defense of extreme emotional disturbance] if it is reasonably supported by the evidence and the logical inferences drawn therefrom.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he determination of the presence or absence of extreme emotional disturbance is one of fact for the trier, and our review is the same whether the trier of fact is a judge, a panel of judges or a jury”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.