186 Conn. App. 51 - State v. Manuel T.’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
August 2021
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Golding · State v. Eleck · Wright v. Commissioner of Correction · 169 Conn. App. 56 - State v. Estrella J.C. · State v. Nasheed
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. Did the Appellate Court apply the proper standard in determining that, in a criminal prosecution for sexual abuse of a child, hearsay statements made during a forensic interview of the child complainant are admissible under § 8-3 (5) of the Connecticut Code of Evidence? "2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by excluding from evidence certain screenshots of text messages?”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Manuel T.“1. Did the Appellate Court apply the proper standard in determining that, in a criminal prosecution for sexual abuse of a child, hearsay statements made during a forensic interview of the child complainant are admissible under § 8-3 (5) of the Connecticut Code of Evidence?”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Manuel T.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.