Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 186 Conn. App. 665 - Reinke v. Sing

186 Conn. App. 665 - Reinke v. Sing’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Billington v. Billington · Weinstein v. Weinstein · O'BRIEN v. Seyer · Ramin v. Ramin · Dietter v. Dietter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “case law reflects that parties in a dissolution action are [u]nlike civil litigants who stand at arm's length from one another .... For this reason, and because parties in a dissolution action need information about each other's income and assets to pursue their cause of action, [Connecticut] case law imposes a duty on parties in a dissolution action to fully and frankly disclose their financial information. [Connecticut] decisional law, however, has limited this fiduciary-like duty to disclosure and, in light of that disclosure obligation, to proving the absence of harm once proper disclosure has not occurred[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It is a fundamental principle of appellate review that our appellate courts do not presume error on the part of the trial court.... Rather, we presume that the trial court, in rendering its judgment ... undertook the proper analysis of the law and the facts..... [T]he trial court's ruling is entitled to the reasonable presumption that it is correct unless the party challenging the ruling has satisfied its burden demonstrating the contrary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Although marital parties are not necessarily in the relationship of fiduciary to beneficiary, [the Connecticut Supreme Court] believe[s] that no less disclosure is required of such parties when they come to court seeking to terminate their marriage.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.