Bilger v. Nunan’s Empirical Analysis
186 F. 665 · 1911
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
September 1912
most recently cited
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on John Smith v. Robert Bell · Giles v. Little · Roberts v. Lewis · Little v. Giles · Farish v. Wayman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Hereby giving her full power and authority to sell, convey, deed and transfer all or any part of said property fully and absolutely so as to pass complete title to purchasers or grantees from her as she may see fit.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bilger v. Nunan““That whatever of my said property and the proceeds thereof which remains In the hands of said Caroline Cardwell at her death shall go to our daughters.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bilger v. Nunan““And the rest of whatever so remains shall be divided equally among my daughters.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bilger v. Nunan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.