Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 186 F.2d 704 - Crow v. United States

Crow v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

186 F.2d 704 · 1950

Citation profile

75
cited by 75 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
September 2011
most recently cited

59 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 75 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2011 · most notably Heflin v. United States (1959), Black v. United States (1959)

59 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

5401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McNally v. Hill · United States v. Gallagher · Barrett v. Hunter · McNealy v. Johnston

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Since the motion under Section 2255 was designed to provide a direct attack in place of collateral attack under habeas corpus, it is logical to conclude that the intent of Congress was to limit the scope of relief under it to that on habeas corpus. Relief under habeas corpus is limited to release from present detention. It is not available to test the legality of threatened detention. It does not lie to secure a judicial decision which, even if determined in the prisoner’s favor, would not result in his immediate release [McNealy v. Johnston, 9 Cir., 100 F.2d 280 ].””
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““A prisoner in custody * * * claiming the right to be released * * * may move the court which imposed the sentence to vacate, set aside or correct the sentence.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.