Redditt v. Trimble

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

January 15, 1951.

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1951-01-15

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1952

1 federal appellate ·

1 counsel of record

Relies on Hackworth v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1951-01-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

On petition for writ of mandamus.

Thomas F. Turley, Jr., Memphis, Tenn., for petitioners.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Petition for writ of mandamus dismissed on the ground that the petition fails to state facts sufficient to justify the issuance of a writ of mandamus, and for the reason that it appears upon the face of the petition that petitioners appear to have abandoned their remedies in the Courts of the State of Arkansas rather than to have exhausted the remedies there available to them.