Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 186 F.3d 178 - United States v. Krcic

United States v. Krcic’s Empirical Analysis

186 F.3d 178 · 1999

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
June 2006
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Howard · United States v. Chavez-Palacios · United States v. Butler · United States v. Negron · Mar Oil, S.A. v. Morrissey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Therefore, the government concludes, the denial of the three-level reduction should be affirmed. 25 We review for clear error the district court's finding as to whether defendant's offense was”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Because we find that the district court's determination that Krcic smuggled the aliens for profit was not clearly erroneous, we affirm the district court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the immigration laws have a certain inexorability.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.