Jeffrey Prosser 98-7607 v. Margaret S Prosser Jeffrey J Prosser’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

7 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “conserve judicial energies. In the district court, resolution of the issue before the inevitable delay of the appellate process will be more efficient because of current familiarity with the matter. Similarly, concurrent consideration of challenges to the merits and the imposition of sanctions avoids the invariable demand on two separate appellate panels to acquaint themselves with the un- deriying facts and the parties’ respective legal positions.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 277 F. Supp. 2d 528 - DiPaolo v. Moran

2. “Any attorney or other person admitted to conduct cases in any court of the United States ... who so multiplies the proceedings in any case unreasonably and vexatiously may be required by the court to satisfy personally the excess costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees reasonably incurred because of such conduct.” As we have already decided to award Fee Appel-lees their appellate costs and attorneys’ fees, we need not decide whether to award them”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Feingold v. Graff

3. “because they do not have the benefit of disciplinary guidance from the court.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 84 F. Supp. 2d 629 - Saldana v. Kmart Corp.