Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 186 F.3d 857 - in Re: Bluffton Casting Corporation Sterling Casting Corporation Appeal Of: Perry Coleman Brian Kable Maurice McGee

in Re: Bluffton Casting Corporation Sterling Casting Corporation Appeal Of: Perry Coleman Brian Kable Maurice McGee’s Empirical Analysis

186 F.3d 857 · 1999

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
January 2012
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 2012

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

80199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 158 · 29 U.S.C. § 185 (§ 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 29 U.S.C. § 2102 (§ 3 of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 2104 (§ 5 of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 2105 (§ 6 of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act)

Relies on Caterpillar Inc. v. Williams · Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc. · Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. Coyne · International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Hechler · Nebraska v. Wyoming

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] claim may be preempted under the LMRA either because it depends on interpretation of a CBA or because the claim is founded on the CBA.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “plaintiffs are attempting to enforce their rights under the CBA with a state remedy that would give their liens priority in a bankruptcy proceeding. Because the claims are founded on the CBA, they are preempted whether or not they require analysis of the CBA's terms.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “mechanics and laborers employed in or about any shop, mill, wareroom, storeroom, . . . bridge, reservoir, . . . drainage ditch . . . or any other earth- moving operation . . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.