Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 186 Ill. App. 3d 180 - Battisfore v. Moraites

186 Ill. App. 3d 180 - Battisfore v. Moraites’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
3
states following
March 2012
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently March 2012 · most notably 149 Ill. 2d 568 - Hutchings v. Bauer (1992), 221 Ill. App. 3d 908 - Greer v. Yellow Cab Co. (1991)

29 state decisions

1401989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 117 Ill. 2d 507 - Kirk v. Michael Reese Hospital & Medical Center · Material Service Corp. v. Department of Revenue · 56 Ill. 2d 22 - Barnes v. Washington · 119 Ill. 2d 344 - Elg v. Whittington · 108 Ill. 2d 435 - Wimmer v. Koenigseder

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A possessor of land who creates or permits to remain thereon an excavation or other artificial condition so near an existing highway that he realizes or should realize that it involves an unreasonable risk to others accidentally brought into contact with such condition while traveling with reasonable care upon the highway, is subject to liability for physical harm thereby caused to persons who (a) are traveling on the highway, or (b) foreseeably deviate from it in the ordinary course of travel.” (Restatement (Second) of Torts §368, at 268 (1965).)”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.