Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 186 IND 593 - House v. State

House v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1917

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
November 2010
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 2 district · 44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2010 · most notably Schmuck v. United States (1989), Watford v. State (1957)

10 federal appellate · 2 district · 44 state decisions

17019171920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Polson v. State · Wright v. State · Rose v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Appellee takes the position that the offense of assault and battery is charged in the affidavit, and that therefore under the holding in Rose v. State, [(1870), 33 Ind. 167 ] supra, the verdict is not contrary to law. It will be noticed in this relation that the affidavit omits from the statutory definition of assault and battery the words ‘touch,’ ‘rude,’ ‘insolent’ or ‘angry manner.’ The affidavit alleges that appellants unlawfully, feloniously, forcibly and fraudulently carried off C. S. Mercer, forcibly and against his will. It is evident from the language used in the affidavit that there was no intent to charge an assault and battery. The affidavit does not charge the offense of assault and battery in the language of the statute and neither does it use words of similar import or meaning.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.