186 Md. App. 320 - Gross v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
August 2019
most recently cited
2 district · 15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Brady v. United States · Spencer v. State of Texas a Bell · Marshall v. Lonberger · Henderson v. Morgan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Is an agreement by the sentencing judge, the defendant and the prosecutor as to what the maximum sentence will be if the plea is accepted. In the subject case, the ABA plea agreement specified the exact sentence that would be imposed. In some ABA plea agreements, however, the judge, prosecutor and the defendant simply agree that if the plea is accepted the sentence imposed will not exceed a specified number of days or years.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Technically, appellant did not have a right to appeal “his sentence” as he was told on the date sentence was imposed. He had a right to file a[n] [application] seeking leave to appeal the conviction and sentence. Holmes, 401 Md. at 445-46 [ 932 A.2d 698 ]. Moreover, at no point was he told that he had thirty days to file a[n] [application] for leave to appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[W]e have never held that the judge must himself explain the elements of each charge to the defendant on the record. Rather, the constitutional prerequisites of a valid plea may be satisfied where the record accurately reflects that the nature of the charge and the elements of the crime were explained to the defendant by his [or her] own, competent counsel.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Tate v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.