Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 186 MICH 203 - Yonkus v. McKay

Yonkus v. McKay’s Empirical Analysis

1915

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
July 2009
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently July 2009

12 state decisions

401915192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fraser v. Jennison · People v. Sweeney · Woodin v. Durfee · Stroh v. Hinchman · Levyn v. Koppin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The administration of justice does not require the establishment of a rule which compels the jury to accept as absolute verity every uncontradicted statement a witness may make.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.