Leach v. Dolese’s Empirical Analysis
1915
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 2009
1 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Winans v. . Winans · Vandervelde v. Wilson · Coon v. Coon · Goodenow v. Curtis · Estey v. Capital Investment, Building & Loan Ass'n
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It follows that, if it is sought to enforce by an action a contract which in its inception was tainted by usury, the forfeiture of interest becomes operative under the statute.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““These decisions are authority for the rule that the penalty of the statute attaches only when effort is made to enforce a usurious contract.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McKenna v. Wilson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.