Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 186 N.C. 105 - Hall v. . Artis

Hall v. . Artis’s Empirical Analysis

1923

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
February 1974
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 1974

5 state decisions

20192319301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stacey Cheese Co. v. Pipkin · Sewing Machine Co. v. . Burger · McLaurin v. . McLaurin · Roseman v. Roseman. · Ewbank v. Turner.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is a general rule, frequently approved in our decisions, that if an inferior court or tribunal has no jurisdiction of a cause, an appeal from its decision confers no jurisdiction upon the appellate court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.