Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

186 N.C. 784

119 S.E 171

State v. . Biggerstaff

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 1923

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1923-12-20

Decided 1923-12-20

Per Curiam.

¶1 Defendant relies entirely upon his demurrer to the evidence and motion for dismissal, or for judgment as of nonsuit under O. S., 4643. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, the accepted position on a motion of this hind (S. v. Rountree, 181 N. C., 535), we think the trial court was justified in submitting the case to the jury, and that the verdict is fully supported by the evidence.

¶2 No benefit would be derived from detailing the testimony of the several witnesses, as the only question before us is whether it is sufficient to carry the case to the jury, and we think it is.

¶3 No error.

/186/nc/784 · .json · Public domain