Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 186 N.C. App. 308 - State v. Gobal

186 N.C. App. 308 - State v. Gobal’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

50 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Odom · Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Schoonejongen · International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 406 v. Guidry · State v. Braxton · National Cable & Telecommunications Ass'n v. Gulf Power Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Statements elicited by a defendant on cross-examination are, even if error, invited error, by which a defendant cannot be prejudiced as a matter of law.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Constitutional issues not raised and passed upon at trial will not be considered for the first time on appeal, not even for plain error.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[i]f scientific, technical or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion[.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.