Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 186 NW2D 426 - Klein v. Harper

Klein v. Harper’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
4
states following
December 2025
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently December 2025

18 state decisions

60197119801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 127 Cal. App. 2d 511 - Guerra v. Balestrieri · Larson v. Meyer · Gleson v. Thompson · Gravseth v. Farmers Union Oil Company of Minot · Thornburg v. Perleberg

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A motion for a new trial on the ground that damages are excessive and appear to have been given under the influence of passion and prejudice is addressed to the sound judicial discretion of the trial court and the appellate court will not reverse the trial court’s order on that ground unless an abuse of discretion is clearly shown.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.