Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 186 NW2D 621 - Fuchs v. Rose

Fuchs v. Rose’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 1995
most recently cited

2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently September 1995

2 state decisions

10197119801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Falls Industries, Inc. v. Consolidated Chemical Industries, Inc. · Adams v. Deur · Schall v. Lorenzen · Vint v. Ashland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a plaintiff who has performed under the illegal bargain may recover if the statute is merely malum prohibitum and the denial of relief is wholly out or proportion to the requirements of public policy or appropriate individual punishment____ The commerce commission regulations are indeed a part of the law of the land and must be obeyed.... But we are unwilling to deny recovery under the circumstances shown here simply because the lease was not in writing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.