¶1 Judgment affirmed, with costs, on authority of Van Winkle v. Van Winkle (184 N. Y. 193).
¶2 Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ, Absent: O’Brien, J
186 N.Y. 605
79 N.E 1107
Decided December 18, 1906
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1906-12-18
Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 29, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action of ejectment to recover an undivided share of certain lands.
Relies on Van Winkle v. . Van Winkle
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1906-12-18
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently December 1968
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 Judgment affirmed, with costs, on authority of Van Winkle v. Van Winkle (184 N. Y. 193).
¶2 Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ, Absent: O’Brien, J