Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 186 Okla. 140 - Webb v. Moran

Webb v. Moran’s Empirical Analysis

1939

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
2
states following
July 2009
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently July 2009 · most notably Nyhus v. Travel Management Corp. (1972), Robberson Steel Co. v. Harrell (1949)

5 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

10019391940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ball v. White · Harlow Publishing Co. v. Patrick · Appleman v. Pepis · Oklahoma Portland Cement Co. v. Pollock · Newman v. Roach

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is, of course, axiomatic that the parties to an existing contract may subsequently enter into a valid agreement to extinguish, rescind or modify the former contract. 12 Am. Jur. par. 431, pg. 1011; 12 Am. Jur. 983 , par. 405; Appleman et al. v. Pepis, 117 Okla. 199 , 246 P. 225 . But as with any other agreement, the contract to rescind must be by mutual consent of the parties.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““A contract is not void for uncertainty, even though it does not specify all the details with respect to its subject matter, if, according to its terms, it is sufficiently definite so that it can be ascertained with a reasonable degree of certainty what the parties intended to agree to.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.